“The DronePort at the White House Ballroom will be, perhaps, the most sophisticated anywhere in the World! It will safeguard our Nation’s Capital, Washington, D.C., long into the future. Judge Richard Leon should stop playing games with America’s Security! If anything happens, he will be held responsible for the Death and Destruction caused to our Country. He has already created enough problems by allowing “Top Secret” information to be released and exposed based on a ridiculous lawsuit started by a highly litigious woman (serial plaintiff!) whose “strolling,” in her opinion, will be disturbed by the new, desperately needed structure – In any event, a woman who has absolutely no STANDING! With the advent of highly sophisticated, and powerful, modern day weaponry, we can no longer defend Washington, D.C., with rifles and pistols, alone. This ridiculous lawsuit must be dismissed, IMMEDIATELY! President DONALD J. TRUMP”
- 01True
“DronePort at the White House Ballroom”
The "DronePort" is confirmed — Trump's planned White House ballroom includes a rooftop drone base as part of a six-story subterranean security complex currently under construction.
- 01 Military Timesproof ⟶
- 02Distortion
“Judge Richard Leon... allowing 'Top Secret' information to be released”
Judge Leon blocked construction on the grounds that Trump lacked congressional authorization — he did not "allow top secret information to be released." Security details became public through court filings submitted by the Trump administration itself, not through any judicial order to disclose classified material.
- 03Distortion
“a highly litigious woman (serial plaintiff!) whose 'strolling' will be disturbed”
The lawsuit was brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, a federally chartered nonprofit with a 60-year history — not by a single woman with a personal grievance about strolling. Alison Hoagland represents the organization as co-plaintiff. Characterizing it as the lawsuit of one litigious individual is a significant distortion.
- 04Distortion
“a woman who has absolutely no STANDING”
Judge Leon found the lawsuit likely to succeed on the merits and issued an injunction — implicitly recognizing standing. The appeals court lifted the injunction on national security grounds but did not rule that plaintiffs lack standing. Trump's claim of "absolutely no STANDING" contradicts the court record.